Xbox |OT|

[WoodenPints]

Imaginedvl said:

shikamaru317 said:

Yeah. I understand them wanting in on the battlepass money that so many other publishers are getting, but it's an RPG, we don't really need a battlepass in an RPG, even if it is cosmetic only like they promise.

Diablo is an ARPG. Battlepass makes a lot of sense.
You are getting a full game for the 70$ price tag. You will get more content in the base game than probably the majority of AAA games coming out these days...

I'm not sure why people find anything wrong with that. Battlepasss (or Seasons in Diablo) are here to have a constrant stream of new content.
And you are paying ONLY for cosmestic stuff.

I do not think think having a full game with so much content at 70$ is a joke at all,. Seasons/Battlepass are here to support the future contents and this is more than welcome if you like the game knowing that it will keep getting new stuffs years after years.

It is like people prefers to pay 70$ to get the full game (like you do with Diablo 4) and then nothing else... Of they are offended if the developper is also adding battlepass/season to support future content... I have hard understanding that :) 

I don't have a problem with battle passes in general but if they wanted to go that route of monetization's and microtransactions then it should launch as a f2p title much like Path of Exile and not at £60 and infact Path of Exile 2 will be launching late this year or early next year with a full 7 act campaign and they monetize by selling cosmetics and battle passes without requiring a £60 price tag so I think it's fair to call out D4 for doing both.