AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 6% faster in gaming than Core i9-13900K according to leaked AMD review guide
6% faster than 13900k and 16% faster than 7950x. Take it with a grain of salt as it's a first party benchmarks but still, looking pretty good and really, it is how Zen 4 should have launched imo. What's interesting is there are some games where the 7950X3D performs worse than 7950X likely due to game not switching CCDs.
Atomic Heart Benchmark Test & Performance Analysis Review
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/atomic-heart-benchmark-test-performance-analysis/5.html
Once again we see the 3080 being faster than it should be compared to it's positioning during launch as with 1440p or 1080p, Radeon was a sure fire win at lower resolutions but these days, the 3080 is able to keep up with a 6900XT in various titles that we have seen. My theory is that when the Ampere/RDNA 2 launched, we saw that the 30 series having a cpu overhead in various games at the time at lower resolutions. But as techpowerup pairs their GPUs with a 13900k, it brute forces the driver overhead and shows us what Ampere can really do.
A770 is also performing quite well with DX12 titles. The fact that you can buy a A750 (usually around 8-10% within A770) for $250 and have similar performance to a $350-$400 6700XT/3060Ti is nuts.
AMD Preps New 1.0.0.7 Chipset Driver Optimized For Ryzen 7000 3D V-Cache CPUs
https://wccftech.com/amd-preps-new-1-0-0-7-chipset-driver-optimized-for-ryzen-7000-3d-v-cache-cpus/
PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850
