All those forays into the NAND segment and other ventures only to kill them two or three years later don't do them any good. They waste the money on R&D only to quit before they're able to reap the profits of those projects.
Let's hope for the sake of the market, and their own, that they don't consider their GPUs as worthless products.
It's also interesting how far behind TSMC they are despite spending all that money. It's like they're obsessed with full node upgrades while TSMC is happy doing half or even less of that jumps, inventing names along the way. It's like the first dual cores processors where Intel surpassed AMD because Intel went the cheap and practical route while AMD waited until they got a true cual core CPU, not two CPUs "glued together", only this time Intel is the one on the losing end.
Please excuse my bad English.
Former gaming PC: i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070
Current gaming PC: R5-7600, 32GB RAM 6000MT/s (CL30) and a RX 9060XT 16GB
Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.
