By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
zero129 said:
DonFerrari said:

My statement disagree on the premisse that SE was selecting reviewers to induce a better score, which didn't happen. So whatever reasons and reviewers SE selected doesn't have anything to do with any allegedly score manipulation.

How does that disagree with "SE picking reviewers didnt pay off"?

It disagree from your original intention before the scores showed off and your implication of SE picking reviewers to get a better score/reviews. Or you are going to pretend that wasn't your insinuation when first bringing the point?

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."