By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari said:
zero129 said:

How exactly does that disagree with what i said?. The game seems to be shit, the reviews clearly reviewed it as such. SE limiting who could review it didnt pay off for them. No where does your statement disagree with mine.

My statement disagree on the premisse that SE was selecting reviewers to induce a better score, which didn't happen. So whatever reasons and reviewers SE selected doesn't have anything to do with any allegedly score manipulation.

How does that disagree with "SE picking reviewers didnt pay off"?