Why is LIVE considered better than PSN?

[gebx]

ssj12 said:

gebx said:
Because the only movie/television studio to sign up on PSN is Sony...
Because 90% of demos released on PSN are delayed or don't even make it
Because other then Sony exclusives, 0 beta's have been available to the PSN
Because Leo-J alone accounts for 120,000 of the supposed 10 millions PSN accounts.
Because Home is still just a promise and still hasn't been released
Because private "text" chating while playing games is retarded..
Because it took Sony 19 months for the basic blocks that MS has had for years

Because.. Because.. Because...

 

realistically you know it took M$ 5 years to build LIVE to what it is right? Xbox's life plus what the 360 has had so far = what it is now.

 

Took years to develop the ipod.. but sure as hell didn't take long for fake imitations to come out...

 

Edit-  bah people probably won't get that.. so I'll say it in simpler terms.. its easier to copy something that already exists then to create something new