By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
scrapking said:
DonFerrari said:

Same here. I do think the hybrid idea was great for Nintendo, but the core of that was unified architecture and development. A more powerful fully table console to make the games look and play better would be a plus imho.

Me three.  I would potentially be interested in a home console version of the Switch.  No screen, two cartridge ports, more internal storage, and sell it for around the same cost as the Switch Lite.  They could sell that sucker at a profit, I suspect, because the screen is probably a pretty big chunk of the system's cost.

I think they should have also released a "Switch Pro" a few years back that was powerful enough to offer docked performance in handheld mode.  But that's not enough of an upgrade now, so releasing that now wouldn't make sense.

Screen, battery, small package ads to the cost of making it portable =] (I would just add that for the table version I would be fine with a 300-400 price as a Pro version, same architeture and games but with higher performance)



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."