DonFerrari said:
SvennoJ said:
I hoped Nintendo would have released a standalone console version that always runs at max speed. Better cooling, run at higher clock speed like the docked Switch does already but push it to the max in a better cooled Wii size box. Still the benefit of lower cost, yet offering a choice for native 1080p on TV.
I have no interest in handheld play so the screen part is completely useless to me and the dock rather awkward under the tv. I'm basically paying more for less performance than if there was a console option. BoTW still looked great in 900p on my 1080p projector, but it was always visibly not as sharp as many ps3 and 360 games. Plus I had to put the dock halfway between me and the screen or the left joy-con would randomly disconnect :/ Anyway Nintendo left money on the table, I would have bought a standalone version and more games for Switch. |
Same here. I do think the hybrid idea was great for Nintendo, but the core of that was unified architecture and development. A more powerful fully table console to make the games look and play better would be a plus imho. |
Me three. I would potentially be interested in a home console version of the Switch. No screen, two cartridge ports, more internal storage, and sell it for around the same cost as the Switch Lite. They could sell that sucker at a profit, I suspect, because the screen is probably a pretty big chunk of the system's cost.
I think they should have also released a "Switch Pro" a few years back that was powerful enough to offer docked performance in handheld mode. But that's not enough of an upgrade now, so releasing that now wouldn't make sense.
