Cerebralbore101 said:
That list just runs afoul of all the things I've been pointing out and then some. Expansions to games being counted as their own individual games. Games with less than 10 scored reviews being counted. Yearly Sports/Racing titles being counted. Freemium trash being counted. Games being counted twice, due to being both part of a compilation and a stand alone release. You already admitted that your list was flawed when you said you didn't bother adding in Xbox games that had high scores on PS4/PC/Switch. Why not admit that counting things I listed above is also flawed? We can either take the data as is, without any judgement, or we can take the data with reasonable exceptions/additions. As is, without any judgement XB1 is sorely lacking in games compared to PS4. Taking the data with reasonable exceptions/additions XB1 is also sorely lacking in games compared to PS4. |
Yes, we get it, you are really down on Xbox One - which I guess is the reason for all of your posts in here?
I think if we want to be as hard and restrictive about releases as you are being about Xbox One releases - then the PS4 also comes off much worse than it actually does as well. Btw, if you don't want obvious tells wrt what you are doing, then statements like "Yearly Sports/Racing titles" as a negative should probably be left out. It's a stone's throw from the "Xbox got no games" meme that typically has to conveniently throw out MS exclusives based on spurious requirements of games not being sequels or from "yearly franchises" that are not actually yearly (ex - FM vs FH), or that require games to be AAA (even when the best releases for many years are indies).