Carzy Zarx’s PC Gaming Emporium - Catch Up on All the Latest PC Gaming Related News

[Jizz_Beard_thePirate]

haxxiy said:

Captain_Yuri said:

While the paper specs do look horrid, comparing cross architectures is pretty pointless which you should know considering how horrid the paper specs was with RDNA 2 compared to Ampere. Lovelace is similar to RDNA 2 where it does do more with less. For example, a 4070 Ti has only 7680 shaders and 192 bit memory bus with a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s vs 3090 Ti that has 10752 shaders and 384 bit memory bus and a bandwidth of 1,008 GB/s. Yet according to techspot aka hardware unboxed, at 1440p, the 4070 Ti is 4% faster than a 3090 Ti:

40% higher clocks vs. 40% higher core count, though.

The 3090 Ti has more memory to work with at higher resolutions (the bandwidth is exactly the same) but it'll be more prone to Amdahl's law at lower resolutions, so no wonder the results are like that.

Correct hence why shader count and bus/bandwidth alone doesn't tell the entire story like what Bofferbrauer2 was trying to do.