By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Bofferbrauer2 said:
Captain_Yuri said:

The more reviewers shit on these GPUs, the better. 4080, 4070 Ti, 7900XTX, 7900XT are all turds for their price

I think the 7900XTX is actually okay. Not great for sure, but not a turd either. Just make sure to get a non-reference design.

The other 3 however are all polished turds with some extra raytracing on top to make them extra appealing for uninformed customers.

Meh, a 7900XTX class GPU shouldn't be competing against a bebranded 70 class (4080) nor should aggressive UV+OC+500 watts should be needed to unlock its full potential only to still end up being slower than a stock 4090, sometimes massively slower. The only reason 7900XTX is considered to be good is cause the 4080 is such a turd but imo they are both in the same boat when you consider that getting a non reference cooler means the 7900XTX becomes similarly priced to a 4080. 7900XTX just feels less worse off to buy since it is a bit faster. And that's if you ignore all the other issues surrounding it such as bad drivers, high power consumption, VR incompatibility and too many other things to list. Eventually those should be fixed but until they actually do get fixed, it's hard to recommend it to someone spending $1000+ on a GPU just to deal with all these issues.

Like if a person is gonna spend around $1200 for a AIB 7900XTX or 4080... May as well spend a bit more and get a 4090 which doesn't have any of those issues and is very power efficient along with massive RT advantages + Ai advantages + leadership in Raster. As the green goblin says "It Just Works."

Last edited by Jizz_Beard_thePirate - on 04 January 2023

                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850