outlawauron said:
I disagree more than ever. I see think that their reviews are FAR too short, and the "3-man" review system condenses reviews to 200 word summaries.
I think Game Informer is one of the worst out there. They are far too easy on games. Crap like Spiderman 3 gets an 8, while Jeanne d'arc gets less! What?! I usually think there scores are a joke. |
Seriously?
I can never finish any of their big reviews (GTAIV,MGS,etc) They just talk so damn much and alot of it is negative. I eventually just get tired of reading it since what they focus on tellilng you is boring. LIKE the MGS4 review dont know if youve read it yet all they say is long cutscenes and confusing story....its like are you fuckign serious!?
We all know that the story is insane and that the cutscenes is like watching a movie so dont tell me that in your revie abd they dot even give the cutscenes credit. Honestly theyre reviews are not good.
Oh just in case you havent read the latest one theyve lowered the 3-man reviews to one. Except for the "big" games.
I agree that Jeanne d'arc was better than Spiderman 3.







