| 7900XTX | 4080 |
| 24GB 384 Bit Bus | 16GB 256 Bit Bus |
| 192 ROPs | 112 ROPs |
| 960.0 GB/s | 716.8 GB/s |
| 96 CU | 76 SM |
| 96 RT Cores | 76 RT Cores |
| 61.42 Teraflops | 48.74 Teraflops |
| 355 Watt TDP | 320 Watt TDP |
| Chiplet | Monolithic |
Yet some how, these two are with in single digit % of each other in Raster and around 30-40% difference in Ray Tracing in favor of the 4080. This is like the inverse of Ampere vs RDNA 2 just that Ampere had the Ray Tracing and DLSS advantage while RDNA 3 has no advantage other than price. But when a person is spending $1000 and the competition is $200 more but gives you superior Ray Tracing + DLSS while being more power efficient... AMD just might have sold the 4080...
Idk how a company can create a chiplet architecture that is more inefficient than monolith but here we are... Even their transient spikes feels like Ampere spikes but on TSMC.
Overall both the 7900XTX and 4080 are terrible products for the price. Hopefully both will get a price cut sooner than later.
PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850
