Ryuu96 said:
EpicRandy said:
From the latest documents on CMA reviews (that Ryuu shared ealier): this is after discussing the various statement MS have made regarding Cod and it's willingness to keep the titles on competition. "Such commitments can form the basis of undertakings that are provided by Microsoft to the CMA to alleviate the potential harm that it has been suggested may happen as a result of this transaction. While we believe that such undertakings should not be required given our belief that this transaction does not result in a substantial lessening of competition in any of the identified markets, these commitments would act to safeguard the many benefits to consumers that result from this transaction." If that's truly what the CMA thinks now I don't know how this review could potentially result in a block without seeking remedy with MS |
Unfortunately, that isn't what CMA thinks but what the 3rd party in question thinks. I don't think CMA makes any comments in this document, it's just sharing the thoughts of a 3rd party. |
yeah was about to edit my post to add something to this effect but still the source looks to be reputable and the CMA looks to have taken it into consideration, unless I'm mistaken they did not share any other public submission into the matter despite the fact they should have received hundreds of them.
