By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Chrkeller said:
DonFerrari said:

Liking one game more than another isn't the same of being better than another much less GOTY material over another, sorry.

It isn't the "game I PERSONALLY enjoyed more" or anything similar prize.

I would put Triangle as GotY over Horizon.  I thought Triangle was something special.  GotY isn't really any different than reviews.  It is an opinion.  GTA has won a ton of awards and I would never nominate the series.  I think it is complete and utter trash.  Why would I nominate something for GotY that I thought was awful?  RDR2 fits that bill, it was terrible IMO.  I would never nominate it for GotY.  

When reviewers do ignore several technical aspects and depending on category/genre/platform the metric change then GOTY wouldn't be equal to reviews, otherwise most likely the highest meta would always win GOTY.

gtotheunit91 said:
DonFerrari said:

Well I even think 85+ meta for Pentinent is already to much for how simplistic the game is and Bayo3 also shouldn't be near 90 due to performance issues.

If you think the game is simplistic, you definitely have not played it. It's an insanely deep and dark story that tackles VERY heavy subject matters. Not to mention a huge history lesson. I've learned more about the Holy Roman Empire in 5 hours of this game than I did in my High School history class It earns its M rating for sure. The high critical praise for Pentiment is completely justified. It's gameplay loop though isn't designed to appeal to a mass gaming audience though. It was intentionally made to be a niche game. 

Would I put it over something like GoW: Ragnarok? Absolutely not lol. Ragnarok is a special experience that you don't get to experience that often, and I'm currently working on getting Platinum.

Not that it would matter anyway. Pentiment came out the day after all the nominees were announced, so it wasn't up for any nominations.

Simplistic in design and gameplay not storywise, as that isn't the only aspect a game should be reviewed (and I didn't play it). It can be a good experience, but when for me reviews should be technical and impersonal, Pentiment wouldn't get a high score from me due to that. But I know currently in VGC I would be an outlier as most think reviews should be based on personal taste and enjoyment of that person.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."