By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
RolStoppable said:
ConservagameR said:

So, there's no conservatives who don't like Trump? No conservatives bash Trump or vote against him, or refused to vote for him? As if a conservative could be against Trump and his policies. Same for liberals as to Clinton or Biden, or in this case Pelosi.

Just because he may have taken it further and physically went after one of his own, doesn't mean he couldn't be on the same side. As if a husband would ever murder his wife, or vice versa. Isn't marriage a union? Aren't couples on the same side? Most of the time isn't always.

Comedian was an example. The point how do we know that he meant what he said? Furthermore, there is nothing guaranteeing that mindset, if they are his true beliefs, is coming from a clear conservative viewpoint. Even if Q is what triggered him, Q names both Democrats and Republicans, along with non politicians, so how would that put him on the other side?

I find it quite odd that nothings been said about his mental stability, that he may be a bit, or very, mentally unstable, and it just might not have anything to do with his political affiliation. How would that have helped make conservatives look bad though?

Bolded: Logical deduction.

His mental stability has been talked about immediately. Obviously he isn't right in the head, because otherwise his blog wouldn't have hosted so much rubbish and he wouldn't have gone to Pelosi's house.

As for conservatives looking bad, that has been done by conservatives themselves. Namely by denying that the culprit is a far-right nutjob and looking for every possible excuse to align him with the political left. Do you know what European conservatives do when a far-right nutjob commits a crime? They call it a crime and clearly distance themselves from such people instead of trying to shift the blame or even endorsing it. But then again, Europe has the benefit of the political right being split up into conservatives and far-right nutjobs, whereas in the USA the conservatives seem to happily mix with the far-right all too often. Although after the results of the midterm elections where far-right affiliation has backfired, conservatives may begin to rethink their attitude.

The question then being if the left is so aware he's mentally unstable or mentally ill, then why not point that out and leave it at that? Why also add that it's because he's clearly a crazy conservative? Because you don't let a good political opportunity go to waste, especially right before the mid terms.

Logical deduction = political deduction. Got it.

This is also why the right won't simply point out it's mental illness, because if they do, like in the past, the left will keep hammering the so called conservative connection as if it's vital. So the right also points out why it's just as likely, if not more likely, that the culprit is a liberal.

Trying to split the left and right is normal and done all the time in America. The right very rarely acknowledges the bad things the far right might do, because while the left will acknowledge far left negative happenings at times, it's always followed by but, as in it's not that big of a deal, and then when election time comes, they vote left anyway, so why would the right fight each other and split themselves when the left won't in the end no matter what. It's good strategy from the right based on how the left operates.

How often the culprit is actually right or left, if we left it up to the media, would be on the right 99% of the time, coincidentally. If that were the truth, then there's no chance that DeSantis, a conservative, could've crushed Crist as badly as he did in a purple state.