By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Captain_Yuri said:
QUAKECore89 said:

Just in time i was reading this article, it's really sure chaos going on!

https://videocardz.com/newz/amd-confirms-rx-7900-xtx-is-rtx-4080-competitor-fsr3-may-be-supported-by-pre-rdna3-architectures

LOL

Zen 4 Flop
RDNA 3 Flop

No such thing a bad product, only a bad price.

JEMC said:

Ok, now I'm a bit lost. I know the difference in shaders with the Ada GPUs is so big that we've made those kind of comments, but is the difference between the XTX and the XT so big? I know one has 12 CUs less than the other, but the full Navi 32 GPU has, allegedly, 60CUs, putting the 7900XT in the middle of both full chips.

The shader output difference between the XT and XTX is about 24%. It should be a lower tier part.
It's not just CU's we are looking at here, but clock reductions too.
Does come with it 55w of less power usage, so that might be the make it/break it decider for a lot of people.

Really depends how AMD fills out the rest of the product stack I guess, but considering anything below is going to have cutbacks of more than 24% than the highest tier part, it could be some significant jumps between mid range and high-end.

Either way, I don't care much about the name of something, I do care about the price/performance. It could be called the Radeon 6200, but if it performs brilliantly, they will get my coin.



--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--