Carzy Zarx’s PC Gaming Emporium - Catch Up on All the Latest PC Gaming Related News

[Jizz_Beard_thePirate]

QUAKECore89 said:

I hope you guys notice what AMD and Intel up to on why they're behind, they're letting Nvidia always innovate their technologies first and wait for the controversy to lurk the critical technical problems from the media before they start actual compete with Nvidia.

This has to be explain why AMD and Intel produced some type of value GPUs slowly. They're dodging power lmao.

I would agree if they caught up when the tech matured but they haven't.

Turing came out and AMD didn't have RT/Ai upscaling with RDNA 1 so people made the excuse that Turing was a beta test and those features were not needed. Alright fair enough. Then AMD came out with RDNA 2 which performed worse than a 2080 Ti in many RT tests while Ampere far exceeded RDNA 2 in RT. People made the excuse that it was AMD's first attempt. Now RDNA 3 comes out and not only is it slower than 4090 in Raster while 6900XT was competitive against 3090, but it once again has last gen RT performance.

See the reality is that AMD isn't letting Nvidia innovate their technologies first in a 4D chess move. The reality is that AMD simply has inferior engineers and it's time to stop making excuses for them. AMD had 3 generations now to catch up yet the pattern is obvious. They will always be a generation behind in Ray Tracing just like how they were behind in DX11 during GCN era.