By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Bofferbrauer2 said:

Hardware Unboxed compared XeSS to FSR 2.1 and DLSS 2.4:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8pFCd76eV0U

tl;dw: Much slower than either DLSS or FSR (and with Ultra Quality even native most of the time) yet delivers the worst visual quality of the three.

I think there should be a caveat to the tl:dw because he tested this on Nvidia/AMD GPUs and not Intel GPUs. We know for a fact and also by Intels own announcement that XeSS is made for XMX that's exclusive to Intel GPUs and Intel did say that XeSS will run and look worse when running on other platforms. So while the video is a good thing to look into for those that may want to run XeSS on RDNA 2 for example, I wouldn't say it's worse than either DLSS/FSR until we see it running on Arc.



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850