| Captain_Yuri said: Yea this is what I meant when I said it probably won't be usable at all pre-4000 even if you could use it. Cause one thing you don't want is worse than native input latency and DLSS 3 in performance mode can give you better than native input latency but worse than DLSS 2. In some situations, that would be a good reason to enable it because of the smoother framerates. So while I am sure they will improve the artifacting with later iterations and continue to improve on the input latency, you really need the super fast Tensor Cores in Lovelace that is able to process the rendered frames fast enough. I do think Hardware Unboxed continues to be too AMD bias though such as in that video where they mainly focused on negativity where as Digital Foundry did a better job of presenting the pros and cons of DLSS 3. Tune in when AMD makes a worse version where Hardware Unboxed will praise it. |
I honestly think HU is the worst place to go for Nvidia news, seeing as how the dude will forever hold his grudge in the worst way possible, so an Nvidia user wanting to see benches or words from his channel are always gonna be in for a bad time.
DF and Steve at GN are like the two sources I'd trust for not much of a biased outlook on either side.
Pretty sure HU did a vid where they praised the fuck outta FSR vs DLSS, and as much as I like FSR on my 1080ti, I vastly prefer 2.1 over 1.0, because 1.0 just looks like arse.
Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.
