| Xxain said: if anybody was going to buy tri-Ace it would be SE themselves. None of the big 3 want tri-Ace because tri-Ace does not have anything to offer. tri-Ace's biggest blunder was not creating self owned IP's. All their games are owned by somebody else. I don't understand why tri-Ace has not done a kickstart/crowdfund or something. They just sit around begging fans to beg SE for more SO/VP games. |
SE is looking for money and even slimmed out so I don't think they would buy tri-Ace.
And regarding studio with people but no IP Sony have bought similar situation (like in Insomniac), it makes a lot cheaper and also allow Sony to foster them and give IPs they have dormant, so not totally unlikely.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
