JWeinCom said:
If you see that comment as too over the top, you and I have a very different definition of even keeled. I haven't seen any significant people claiming long term storytelling was a bad thing. I'm sure there's someone in the vast world of social media saying something like that, but at best it's a vocal minority. I have seen people saying that AEW's style of storytelling is not good and not going to appeal to casuals. Happy to explain the difference, or happy to drop it. Up to you. |
I didn't say it was over the top, it just seemed you got really annoyed or bothered by my initial comment, as if it was directed at you when it wasn't.
Look what would be the point of you explaining anything when it will likely be you talking down to me in the process (not saying you WILL do that, but it will likely come across to me like that). I been watch wrestling on and off for close to 25 years or so. In that time I have seen how most WWF/WWE fans react to any competition, they crap on it. Saw it with WCW, ECW (even with the working relation ship they had with WWE), and TNA. It is always the same. When the competition does something, these hardcore WWF/WWE fans say its crap, but when the WWE does it, man its great.
I'm seeing that with AEW and WWE now. The way HHH is booking WWE now (or at least so far) is incredibly similar to AEW. Yes I know he booked NXT like this in the past. I'm not say AEW booking is perfect (it isn't), but the people saying that don't even watch in most cases and are saying it mostly because of blind loyalty to the WWE, the same loyalty that I have seen for 20 plus years. That is where my hypocrisy comment came from, that was all I was saying, don't really need any elaboration on why you or others think the AEW storytelling is bad or not.