By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Chazore said:
DonFerrari said:

For me it is much more dangerous if they acquire and don't release good games with consistence.

Well if they release flop after flop, there isn't much they can do to the rest of the industry if they are the ones failing, and Xbox/Sony/Nintendo/other pubs end up rising above them in terms of sales/quality titles. 

Of course it'd be bad if they somehow completely gobbled up every last shred of free studios, or 2 of the big 3, but I don't see either happening in our lifetime, not for one holding's company.

I was thinking on the term that if they have multiples flops several good studios would go under, perhaps even if MS/Sony/Nintendo bought them out at that time there wouldn't be much to salvage.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."