I'm not going to pretend that I understand half the things said in that article. But anyway:
I was going to ask if the site is credible, but given how new it appears to be, the answer is no. Maybe if we knew how's behind it, things would change but, for now, I'd take it with huge amounts of salt.
That said, the Infinity Cache sizes are quite interesting (and easier to understand). Looks like, while it does work and help in certain scenarios, fast access to VRAM is still necessary, hence why they would have reduced the IC but bumped the memory bus width compared to Navi 2x. This, if true, could help the cards perform better at higher resolutions, where it was obvious that the memory configuration hindered their real performance, something we all saw with the xx50cards, that with just slightly better memory, offered better performance.
In any case, I'd wait for other sources to start guessing its performance.
Please excuse my bad English.
Former gaming PC: i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070
Current gaming PC: R5-7600, 32GB RAM 6000MT/s (CL30) and a RX 9060XT 16GB
Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.
