Bofferbrauer2 said:
For a chip that's less than half a 4090, I find the 4070 still consumes too much power. As going by the naming scheme, I think it would have been better if the 340 SKU would have been the 4090 and the 4090 a 4090Ti since the gap between the 3080 and the rumored 3080Ti seems way too big. On the other hand, this would have meant a memory downgrade to the current gen for the 4090... |
I don't think that's unusual. Look at a 6700XT vs 6900XT. Despite the 6700XT having 40 CU vs 6900XT having 80CUs, the TBP of 6700XT is 230 watts vs 300 watts of a 6900XT.
PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Sapphire 9070 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850








