Azzanation said:
Your wording is out of context. "Wasn't" is referring to past tense and in this case, you are talking about an old game and claimed it "wasn't" good. You would need to add more to that statement, otherwise you are just saying the game isn't good. Example: Cyberpunk wasn't good / Cyberpunk isn't good. Has the exact same meaning unless you add more to why it wasn't good in past tense like its rushed release etc. You could have easily said "SoTs wasn't good at launch" but instead you choose the wording to talk about the entire game before and now. I would have easily agreed with you if you worded it correctly but you didn't, and you still haven't corrected your statement, and are now hiding behind your wording. Is SoTs a good game today? A lot of those who play it will say it is. Have you said that? No. Because you either haven't played the game or refuse to give credit to where its due and are basing the entire game off its 2018 reviews who have not re-reviewed the game. 2022 SoTs is not 2018 SoTs. And you know that. |
Always learnt that was is used for past tense, and in more than one instance talked about reviews (which are done on release), so you decided to assume otherwise on your on end. I know the game is not the same anymore and was talking about it on release, and yet you were also defending it on release as a great game harassed by reviewers and whatnot.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."