Carzy Zarx’s PC Gaming Emporium - Catch Up on All the Latest PC Gaming Related News

[Jizz_Beard_thePirate]

Bofferbrauer2 said:

Captain_Yuri said:

Yea but let's not forget the Titan RTX which was $2500 which then makes the 3090s $1500 price tag seem like a discount. And while technically the 2080 Ti had an MSRP of $999, 2080 Ti FE was still $1200 and majority of them was even more. Only like Evga 2080 Ti Black edition managed to hit that MSRP if I remember correctly.

So I don't think it's as simple as they will always increase the price even on their top end models not to say $1800 is an unreasonable prediction either.

The 4090 looked like a discount until one checked all the features and saw that some professional ones from the Titans were missing and the prices of the Titans before the way overpriced RTX and V models

Also worth noting maybe is that before the 3090, all xx90 models were dual GPUs, as in dual xx80 models. The 3090 falls a bit short in that regard imo.

Yea but at that point, you shouldn't be comparing the Titan against the 3090 anyway. Either you are going to compare the Titans against the 3090 and include Titan RTX or don't compare them at all... You can't have it both ways... The reality is that the 3000 series were priced much better than many people thought it would.

The dual GPUs were never all that great imo. With SLI/Crossfire being dead, it wasn't much of a surprise they went this route. And considering the last dual GPU from Nvidia was the Titan Z that had an MSRP of $3000... Yea I don't mind the 3090 costing $1500 in comparison...