Alby_da_Wolf said:
Well, put this way is clearer and more equilibrated than the smbu2000's phrase I answered. But, Sony could always make a gamble on its future HW and SW sales and anticipate a price cut, if really necessary and worth it. Obviously, if they manage to keep even a measly lead in WW weekly sales on XB360, I agree with you that they won't cut prices before cost reductions make it possible without huge losses. Anyway, based on analogous past troubles for XBox 1, we can estimate that to break even, accounting for royalties too, a console costly as Sony's and MS' ones must sell anywhere between 35 and 50 millions, with Sony, due to bigger initial losses this time, having to sell EARNING some million consoles more than MS to achieve this goal, although MS accounting for most losses it legally can in a separate report item is muddying a little bit the waters on this matter.
|
Right, there are definitely times where it's better to take a loss now and hope to make it back later.
The problem is that Sony has already done that. Twice. The original price of the system was already a gamble, selling at 200 dollars below production value; then the first price cut to 399/499 pushed those costs even further. You want them to do it again? Well.... anything is possible, but at some point, every product needs to stand on its own two feet, and apparently Sony agrees that the PS3 has reached the point where it needs to do that.
http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a324/Arkives/Disccopy.jpg%5B/IMG%5D">
http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a324/Arkives/Disccopy.jpg%5B/IMG%5D">







