Carzy Zarx’s PC Gaming Emporium - Catch Up on All the Latest PC Gaming Related News

[JEMC]

Captain_Yuri said:

JEMC said:

So, just like we all suspected: the software side os Arc sucks, and w can only hope they manage to fix it in the future.

Now the question is: what will run out first, our hope that they'll fix it or Intel's patience with this whole GPU business?

I think Intel will stay in the game for a while because there's a lot of money to be made. Cryto has basically stopped going down so it's not dead yet and Intel seems to be on AMDs camp and not wanting to nerf the hashrate capabilities. So if they have a compelling product with a good price by the time the next crypto boom happens, then the GPUs will sell themselves. I just hope that they eventually get the kinks worked out to become competitive because Driver support for GPUs is much more essential than CPUs.

I know they won't leave, I was joking. Intels needs to develop GPUs if they want to be relevant in the server and business ssector, where GPUs are slowly taking over CPUs and ARM is also gaining presence.

Still, one can't help but wonder how commited they are if, after a 6 months plus delay, they still have troubles with the kind of software business work with.

Rhonin the wizard said:

JEMC said:

Most of those games are quite old already, (I'm quite certain that Silent Hunter V launched 10 years ago if not more, same as the Ezio AC games.

I don't think many will complain.

The issue is losing access to DLC. From experience when this happened to AC: Revelation I couldn't access the single-player DLC.

But that shouldn't happen. If you've bought the DLC or it was part of the game's package, they must give you access to it. It's like when they remove a game from Steam or GOG, no one can buy it but those that did are still able to download and play it. It's the same with DLCs.

And if Ubi doesn't do it, they they could be sued for that.