By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
HappySqurriel said:
cookingyourmama said:

So you don't have any proof then and are just guessing, sorry i asked the question and you have to come up with the proof. Who says npd's numbers are off, again you have no conclusive proof.

 

 

Please come up with one intelligent reason why NPD would break with the standard approach and not adjust there numbers ... Please just one reason why they would accept being a tracking firm with useless data.

Because their data was so good to begin with that it doesn't need changing, how about that for a possible reason. Plus like i've said before how do you know what changes have taken place at all? Do you think a multi million company with decades of tracking knowledge would come up with significantly wrong data in first place and when it gets changed it significantly changes the original ltd's?