By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ZyroXZ2 said:

I did only 105, so I don't know how many side quests became repeats (it really is still just "too many" and too meaningless lol), apologies!

As for the difficulty, I did mention that if you've played 2D action side scrollers, you'll adapt quickly.  I guess I could have been more clear in stating that it may become "easy", though I think ease is relative.  You might notice I rarely specifically describe difficulty because that is highly dependent on a player's skill, instead I focus on how the challenge is designed (like Elden Ring where it's DESIGNED to kill you over and over again) as opposed to whether I define it as difficult or easy.  I DO make some games seem easier than people imagine, something I learned in season 1 and have since adapted my reviews to avoid saying something that is not necessarily quantifiable on a wider scale.  If I say this game is easy, and someone decides from my review that it's okay for their 5 year old to play, then it might actually be too hard.  For me, Elden Ring was still relatively "easy", but many would disagree and I'd just look like a pompous ass if I said that. Instead, I beat it in 72 hours while being a first wave player with relatively little "Google-able" information.  Someone can simply infer my skill level from that on their own lol

As for our score differences, it depends on what you define a 5 as.  Is a 5 "average" for you, or is that "bad"?  If you say it's "bad", then we'd inherently be in disagreement as my giving a game a 5 is on the bad side.  Of course, I once again remind readers: I'm fine with disagreement, and since you are being civil and laying out your thoughts on the matter as someone who also played, you'll notice I'm not arguing your score.  What IS important is knowing whether you define this game as "bad", because I really couldn't find anything to fault enough to say it was bad since most things were justifiable (short story, low real estate, low budget animation, etc. because this was more of a stretch goal game made clearly on the side).

Fair enough on difficulty,  maybe a better descriptive would of been that I found the combat very repetitive by the time you unlocked all your abilities.

A 5 for me is average but generally I would not recommend a average game to anyone since there so many options out there that above average and many of those options cost less then $15 (the cost if you did not back the game).  This is not a $15 game.  For me I backed the higher tier that came with this game because I wanted to support the creation of the main game so if the main game is good then it was worth every penny.  

If you someone that did not back the game but now want to support it creation then that a good reason to spend the $15 but in isolation I could not recommend it.

If you view this as a introduction to the Eiyuden Chronicle universe told with a short story then I would say play through the main quest lines and do just enough side quests that you can get through the game and it a decent experience.  I would not say it made me more excited for Eiyuden Chronicle but it also did not make me less excited.  I just hope the main game is not filled with many time killers and little main plot like rising.

If you have no interest in a suikoden style game and was looking for a platformer or a action RPG then I would tell them to skip this game as it not worth playing unless you interested in getting to know the universe for the main game before playing it.