By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

I want to see how they spin this part:

"Mark Pepermaster also confirmed that Zen4 architecture has IPC between 8% to 10%, while offering over 15%. The new architecture offer over 25% better performance per watt and 35% overall performance improvement over Zen3 architecture. This claim is based on Cinebench benchmark."

So now a processor with a 170W TDP (or whatever) that gives around a 15% better performance, is supposed to bring a 25% perf/watt improvement over a 105W one? Something doesn't feel right.

The 50% improvement of RDNA3 was already said during the launch of the 6000 series, so it's not really something new, but we'll see what we get and what does that 50% figure is about. Is it overall, raster, RT?



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.