CaptainExplosion said:
Yes, because nothing says progressive like removing crop tops, or removing Elena from Street Fighter VI. Oh no, we can't have an African dancer in a bikini in our fighting game, hurr!!
And you clearly do not understand how petty and controlling Saudi Arabia is. They don't just want THEIR women to be trapped in burkas and stoned for not obeying men, they want ALL women to live like that, and making such a change to female video game characters is their newest way of expressing such an outdated desire. First they get rid of Daisy, then next they'll be after Samus. |
Ok I thought you were joking so let me reiterate.
SAUDI ARABIA HAS ZERO INFLUENCE ON ANYTHING NINTENDO DOES!
They have neither the right to tell Nintendo what to do nor do they care. A 5% stake does not give them any power over Nintendo. None at all.
Mario Strikers Battle League was being developed for many years. Saudi Arabia buying a tiny minority stake a few weeks prior to release doesn't mean shit for the game. If Daisy was going to be there she is going to be there. Just not at launch.
Saudi Arabia has not payed a single cent to Nintendo! They bought the stock from other shareholders. That's how this this works. If they ever had the audacity to think that 5% gave them the right to demand from Nintendo to remove any characters, nobody at Nintendo would give a shit.
The Saudis care about money more than the products of the companies they invest in.
So once again, because saying it previously has fallen on deaf ears:
A 5% stake does not give an investor power over the company.
Btw, in Saudi Arabia women do not wear burkas.
Last edited by Kakadu18 - on 05 June 2022