the-pi-guy said:
No it isn't an argument for the second amendment. If people who are paid and trained are unable to make a difference, why would teachers be able to do anything. The school itself had its own police department. Officers are allowed to carry guns in "gun free zones", that been a thing for decades. It's literally an exception in the law that codifies gun free zones. By media, I am talking about the 5 million crime shows, action movies that routinely show such feats where everything turns out okay. The United States is the only major country in the world that deals with these issues, and it's also the one with the most guns. The idea that the solution is more guns should be obviously backwards to anyone that can recognize those two facts. |
Ok I really don't understand your reasoning. You are saying law enforcement is useless, so the people in danger should be disarmed also because law enforcement is useless?
Edit: well they are probably the ones with the most gunfree zones in a gunfilled country. More gunfree zones are backwards.
Last edited by cyberninja45 - on 27 May 2022My 3ds friendcode: 5413-0232-9676 (G-cyber)
