So its out... bechmark reviews.
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-fidelity-fx-fsr-20/2.html
TLDR:
DLSS 2.3 has slightly better image stability at lower resolutions boosted up (performance mode, and 1080p upsampling).
At 1440p, and 4k, and Quality, they are basically the same (DLSS 2,3 and FSR 2.0). FSR2 handles ghosting slightly better than DLSS.
Also performance wise, FSR 2.0, is almost as good as DLSS (on Nvidia cards, which was used to compair to dlss).
Basically in gameplay, you wouldnt notice if it was one or the other.
Techpower up quotes:
"AMD has achieved the unthinkable—the new FidelityFX Super Resolution FSR 2.0 looks amazing, just as good as DLSS 2.0, actually DLSS 2.3 (in Deathloop). Sometimes even slightly better, sometimes slightly worse, but overall, this is a huge win for AMD."
"When comparing "DLSS Quality" against "FSR 2.0 Quality," spotting minor differences is possible, but for every case I found, I'd say it's impossible to declare one output better than the other; it's pretty much just personal preference, or not even that."
"In terms of performance, FSR 2.0 deserves praise, too. While it is a little bit more demanding than FSR 1.0, which is not surprising given the additional logic, it's still mighty fast and pretty much identical to DLSS 2.0 on even NVIDIA hardware, which is able to offload many DLSS upscaling operations to the Tensor Cores. No doubt, on AMD hardware, there will be additional optimizations, but we wouldn't be able to compare performance against DLSS then because it's an NVIDIA exclusive technology. "
-----------------------
Also AMD did a major update to how their cards handle DX11.
Supposedly theres 10-20% gains in many games, and much higher minimum frames (ei. less drops).
For years, people have said, amd needed to fix their DX11 support, to go equal with nvidia.
Well, looks like they finally did some work on it.
