My vote is Nintendo. MS might be worse based on evidence of every anticompetitive thing they've done with it PC for years, but to give them credit the worst they did in console gaming during their brief time at the top early on with the 360 was just throwing money to get exclusive stuff. Probably also their complete lack of interest in cross play online at that time.
I may be a minority in this viewpoint, but I don't think Sony was ever that bad in their most arrogant. When they made the PS3 they made a console that had everything you could want, standard HDMI, Blu Ray, full backward compatibility, non proprietary upgradable hdd, there was even a model with built in WiFi, and they took the extra effort in cooling to give it an internal power supply. The only sin was that it made it too expensive, but compared to what people drop on tech today, it's actually not that bad.
Nintendo has a proven record of anticompetitive practices during the heights of the NES. They even had a ruthless practice of not allowing the same game to be published on their system if it was on some other console. The stranglehold they had on the industry at the time paired with their lawsuit happy nature makes me unequivocally say Nintendo is the worst.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
