Between the Big three (Microsoft, Sony, Nintendo), who is the worst when at the top?

[DragonRouge]

Leynos said:

Sony. They were insanely arrogant in the PS2 era. Worst designed console for devs to work on. 2 controller ports. Very faulty hardware. They didn't care as they knew people would flock to them. They carried this thinking with PS3 with the horrible marketing. $600 price tag. Told people to get 2 jobs. Said rumble was last-gen tech. They crammed a bunch of unnecessary crap in PS3 no one needed to justify their price. They said Nextgen doesn't start until they said it did. The PSP while I love it, had horrible racist ads. The memory stick was costly. Sony was not kind to developers and many bailed in favor of 360.


PS4 was a massive success so now with PS5 Sony started censoring Japanese games but not western as a double standard. Censor what you can tweet from the console. Still stingy about cross-play, even Nintendo embraced that. Jim Ryan telling people no one wants to play old games. Now they are locking people out of PS1 purchases. Tried to shut down PS3 store even tho MS keeps 360s open.



Don't try and bring up the Xbox One reveal. The thing is Microsoft has NEVER been on top. MS acted like that in THIRD PLACE. So as the topic asks who's the worst when on TOP is Sony.

Bolded: This makes me shudder at the thought of MS being at the top.