By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Chazore said:
JEMC said:

I don't think going with x8 PCIe 5.0 lanes will limnit it too much. The 8GB of VRAM over a 128-bit bus may, but we'll have to wait and see. For me, the biggest problem is the price. $399-$499 for an intentionally limited, tier 3 card is a big F U.

At this rate, I may start paying more attention to consoles and skip PC gaming until it eventually crashes due to these unsustainable high prices.

I'm too used to having that extra spare VRAm, so going back to 8gb and the price, along with that "similar" RT performance sounds like a bit of a joke. 

If this is what their "lower than mid-range" card is going to be like, what is their high end going to be like, slightly better than their current gen and not by much?, I hope not, because they should be bringing their A game at this point.

Tired of waiting for them to promise us better and then not fully delivering again. Last time it was raster and by then we were already on RT and Nvidia was on it's 2nd gen. 

There are lots of things to criticize about this rumor, but that's not one of them. The rumor says that the raster performance will be similar, while the RT one "is expected to be a much larger increase than the rasterization increase". How big will it be? No f*cking idea.



Please excuse my bad English.

Former gaming PC: i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Current gaming PC: R5-7600, 32GB RAM 6000MT/s (CL30) and a RX 9060XT 16GB

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.