By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SegaHeart said:

I'm reiterating this, I prefer Sony style of games over Microsoft but I rather Sega go to Microsoft, but still Sony > Microsoft, I just like their style and their games more than Microsoft, but Microsoft + SEGA is a fitting and worth it but i'll still prefer Sony franchise like Wildarms, Ape escape, Wipeout series, Twisted metal, ETC over Halo, Fallout, call of Duty.

Sony gets Konami/Capcom/Square Enix/Namco Bandai/Fromsoftware

Microsoft gets Koei tecmo and to some etent Sega if the prince pulls another move on capcom? or a square enix?

Sonic > Mario/Master Chief/Kratos.

I think Koei Tecmo, and Bandai Namco would be natural fits with Nintendo as those companies have collaborated with Nintendo on several games/crossovers and BN even did part of the work developing Smash 4 and Smash Ultimate, which is one of Nintendo's core franchises these days. Sega and Atlus would fit more naturally with Nintendo imo, but I'd also rather see them go to Microsoft than Sony. Microsoft would still let their games go cross platform, where I feel that Sony would make them console exclusive. Of course, Nintendo really only buys longtime partners or studios looking to be bought so it's unlikely, but it does make me wonder if acquistion wars really and truly got going if they wouldn't be forced to change that policy or risk being left in the dust.