By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
JRPGfan said:

Here is FSR 2.0 (1440->4k) vs Native 4k+TAA+Sharpening enabled:

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/51971605235_5cdec485da_k.jpg    (clik link for big picture, if you want to see it and compaire yourself)

It still looks like it beats out Native 4k imo (even with TAA + Sharpening also applied to the 4k picture).

Granted this is a still picture.
We still need more "in-motion" clips.... but even there (from short clips we have seen), it looked good.

It honestly looks better than Native.

edit:

Also this:

There is a link to a PDF, and if you scroll down to page 55, it reaches the FSR 2.0 part.
Go down futher, you find the screen grabs from differnt modes (not just FSR 2.0 quality).

The performance mode (720-> upscaled to 4k) looks damn good considering its from 720p.
Basically the same black magic of DLSS... impressive it upscales that well.

Feels like the sharpening introduced a bit more aliasing on the plastic green wrapper covering the eyes, wheras in FSR 2.0's it is corrected and looks better, definitely an improvement for sure.

I do wish there was a benchmark tool that features plenty of wires and cables to show off FSR 2.0 both in stills and in motion, because I want to see more of what it can correct over native res. 



Step right up come on in, feel the buzz in your veins, I'm like an chemical electrical right into your brain and I'm the one who killed the Radio, soon you'll all see

So pay up motherfuckers you belong to "V"