JEMC said:
So, you say that but, almost right after that, you come up with
Looks to me that you already have your mind set on what to get. You don't fool me, mate. Even if AMD manages the miracle of being on par with Nvidia on RT while using less power, you'd look at DLSS vs FSR 2.0 or the drivers or any other bit.
So that means that they'll launch in about four or five months. I'd bet on November, and maybe launch along their new GPUs to sell the idea of a full system upgrade. |
Loll I think you missed the part where I said:
"Assuming Lovelace comes out first, my plan is to get a 4080 or 4090 and then wait and see how RDNA 3 performs. If it's comparable, it will be easy to flip it and get RDNA 3."
But yes, I do typically favour Nvidia over AMD. Nvidia's innovation with Ray Tracing and DLSS among other things like RTX voice and Reflex are insane where as AMD's GPU decision feels like a shady salesmen with subpar Ray Tracing and FSR which was terrible until FSR 2.0. But even then, AMD is basically just taking existing tech, adding in a few tweaks and rebranding it as their own where as Nvidia does feel like they are bringing in real innovations in the PC space.
But at the end of the day, I did switch to AMD for Ryzen because AMD brought quite a lot of innovations to the CPU space that Intel was lacking in. If AMD's GPU division can pull a Zen 3 against Nvidia's Lovelace, I would switch. But Nvidia is a different beast than Intel and yes, AMD does need quite a lot to get me to switch. But if AMD is competitive against Nvidia in Ray Tracing and Raster, it should hopefully mean 4k 60fps native in games like Cyberpunk with Ray Tracing. And at that point, the lack of DLSS would be easier to swallow.
PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850