Rockstar announces subscription for GTA Online ($5.99 a month)

[Chazore]

Conina said:

I don't think that this subscription has much value... but who am I to judge about that?

Mileage may vary, and if other people get that sub and enjoy it, that doesn't affect me. If some people play GTA Online most of the time, this sub is probably more suited to them than f.e. the GamePass, if most of the games in it doesn't interest them.

I'm fine with this sub model existing... the same as I'm fine with hundreds of other subs (or overpriced cosmetic DLCs) existing which don't interest me personally.

I'm also fine with kinds of entertainment existing that don't interest me much (f.e. football/soccer, baseball, opera, art galleries, dance clubs, gambling...). Because I'm aware that I'm not the center of the world, and if other perople enjoy these stuff... good for them.

P.S.: Who in this thread told others "to not give a crap" or "to stop complaining"? "Not understanding the complaints" is totally different to telling others "not to complain".

You are your own person, you can judge it based on your own thoughts?.

If you put it like that, what can I say then?, because I don't see the value, and even if I did, the next conclusion would be "all other games should turn into sub models", because that would make sense if agreed upon for value. 

If enough people bought into the subg, it would count as a success, and other studios/devs would see this as a model to roll with for their games going forward, so while this one game will not affect me in the current time frame, there is a higher chance of other games adopting it and affecting me down the road later.

People complained and others bought into the horse armor all those yrs ago, now look at where we're at, cars in a game that cost upwards of £20-40 (and then there's Star Citizen of course).

It's weird seeing you using sports in comparison to a payment plan, but also using it as a means to suggest that disliking something=-disliking and wanting to shut down everything, because that's not what I'm about here.

And now that I know you're fine with the model and how you came to me, it tells me that you're wanting to either shut down my end of the conversation or get me to see it from your pov and agree. Like yes I can disagree with you and all that jazz, but that's not going to result in anything.

If you want to use mirror arguments to basically shut me out, then that's fine, I'll just take that as a suggestion that you don't want to converse with me unless it involves telling me the equivalent of "go away" (I've actually been mulling over our interactions for quite a while and that's the big impression you've been giving me these past few years).