Eagle367 said:
The majority of scientists agree on the scientific basis of the existence of trans people and she rejects them. She also purposefully confuses sex and gender to obscure and strawman arguments. No transgender person or ally denies the biology of trans people. But she pretends like trans people are going around shouting at doctors and believe their sex organs suddenly change. Her line "sex is fact" or whatever is also meant as an obfuscation. But it is interesting how you quickly move from point to point. You asked about harm she does and I pointed it out and you went to a different topic. I am now more interested in your views on trans people. Do you support the hateful message of JK Rowling? |
"Do you support the hateful message of JK Rowling?"
>Before I can answer this question, we both need to nail down exactly what her message is.
I read what JK Rowling had to say in her own words and didn't find anything terribly objectionable.
What is your opinion on this from Rowling?
