Kasz216 said:
makingmusic476 said:
Bingoo said:
both KH and FF are both more hardcore games then anything. Its highly unlikely that casuals will just buy into it. Hell alot of the casuals dont even know about mario, they just care about playing tennis on the wii. It should belong on hardcore platforms where generally more core gamers reside.
Also both are big time in the graphics department. THats why the demand for ps3 ff 7 is because it would be fantastic to see it in some awsome graphics. The wii would be a huge letdown. It also applies to KH.
Also how would you implement the motion? Maybe in KH 3 but not FF 7.
You persume that the wii is bringing in new gamers who would be interested in these things. Which there will be a few, but highly unlikely. |
I agree with this in reference to FFVII. The Wii's greatest strength lies in its innovative controls. With FFVII, fans just want the same game with prettier graphics. They don't want a reinvention of the gameplay, and that's the type of thing that the Wii would best be suited for.
And the game would sell 6-7 million easy regardless of which platform it is released upon.
Kingdom Hearts 3, however, could utilize the Wii's controls in a positive way, and given Disney's liking for Nintendo, combined with SE's lust for money, the Wii seems like the perfect fit for KH3, despite what some fans may want.
|
Really what the fans want doesn't matter. If what you say is true... that it will make 6-7 million on any platform it releases on...
why would you as Square Enix release it on PS3... you'd be idiots... since you'd be doubling your profits on the Wii?
Or even better... DS. (Assuming DS counts.)
I mean if what the fans wanted mattered FF7 would be released.
I mean FF1-6 would be better on the PS3 then DS as well... yet where'd they go?
|
Doubling profits on Wii?
Let's say it would sell seven million on either console. PS3 games cost $10 more than Wii games, so let's also say that SE would get about $4 of that $10 per copy sold.
7,000,000 X $4 = $28,000,000 extra in revenue. Would a ps3 version cost that much more to develop over a Wii version?
Also, NES/SNES to DS is more than a generational leap, providing them ample opportunity to improve those games. PS1 to DS would be like moving from the PS2 to Wii. There wouldn't that much difference (what, half a gen in tech?) outside of the control scheme. It would be a port moreso than a remake.
The tech demos alone show that they have something special in store for their best selling title. Even if it didn't come to the ps3, I'd expect it to hit one of the home consoles.
