By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
No_Name_Needed on 26 February 2022
Edit Thread
JWeinCom said:

No_Name_Needed said:

What would be the point in me pointing out anything that you've said is wrong, you are just going to argue your not wrong. Having said that, I did give you my opinion on the women's division in an edit I made on page 148, and how I think you are wrong on that. But I think you preference for the WWE does play a part in how you see AEW, as I personally think WWE is far worse then anything on AEW and I don't think you've been nearly as critical of them here. But hey that's just my preference and bias coming into play isn't it.

So you're going to put words in my mouth..?

If you think I'm just completely unreasonable and won't acknowledge any legitimate argument, you're free to bugger off.

I haven't mentioned WWE because it's irrelevant. For the sake of argument, I'll just grant that WWE is terrible. That doesn't somehow make AEW's women's division not shit. 

As for you showing I was wrong...

"The women's division is still the smallest and greenest division in AEW, one match on both shows I think is OK for now. If a year or two from now it is still only one match on both Dynamite and Rampage, then it would be a valid complaint."

... yeah, saying you think it's ok for the women's division to suck isn't really an argument. 

You're also just factually wrong. Because, the division has plenty of talented and experienced women. Thunder Rosa, Serena Deeb, Ruby Soho, Leva Bates, Mercedes Martinez, Kris Statlander, Hikaru Shida, Britt Baker. These are not green wrestlers. Mercedes Martinez has 20 years or so of experience, Serena Deeb 10, Hikaru Shida 13 and is a former champion in AEW, Ruby Soho has over a decade of experience, Leva Bates 15. Do none of these women deserve some screen time in the on the company's main show? 

So, I still stand by my criticism. Can you actually explain why it's wrong? And, how about staying away from talking about whatever you're imagining is going on in my head, and stick to what I actually said?

First off, I did not put words in your mouth period, I have no idea what you are talking about. I simply said you would likely say you are not wrong, like most people tend to do. That is not not putting words in your mouth, especially not specific words. I was also never imagining what was going on in your head, that was also unnecessary. No need to get worked up or telling me to bugger off. You could have just ignored my last comment like you said you would.

At this point I'm moving on, I didn't intend to make this a big thing nor do I want it to continue. I typically just lurk on websites for this very reason, to avoid getting into a hostile back and forth with someone. We can both have our opinions and like and or hate whatever we want. Now we can both "bugger off."

Last edited by No_Name_Needed - on 26 February 2022