By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
JWeinCom on 26 February 2022
Edit Thread

No_Name_Needed said:
JWeinCom said:

I have not found flaws in everything they've done. I've found flaws in particular things that are genuinely flawed.

Now, it's possible that I'm finding flaws because I'm just biased. Or, it's possible that I'm finding flaws because there are legitimate flaws. Since you can't actually point out anything I've said that is wrong, I would have to say it's the latter, and this is legitimate criticism not caused by bias.

Which brings me to your question. I brought it up, because I know there are some people who will interpret any criticism as being a hater, even when it is warranted and legitimate. ^_^

What would be the point in me pointing out anything that you've said is wrong, you are just going to argue your not wrong. Having said that, I did give you my opinion on the women's division in an edit I made on page 148, and how I think you are wrong on that. But I think you preference for the WWE does play a part in how you see AEW, as I personally think WWE is far worse then anything on AEW and I don't think you've been nearly as critical of them here. But hey that's just my preference and bias coming into play isn't it.

So you're going to put words in my mouth..?

If you think I'm just completely unreasonable and won't acknowledge any legitimate argument, you're free to bugger off.

I haven't mentioned WWE because it's irrelevant. For the sake of argument, I'll just grant that WWE is terrible. That doesn't somehow make AEW's women's division not shit. 

As for you showing I was wrong...

"The women's division is still the smallest and greenest division in AEW, one match on both shows I think is OK for now. If a year or two from now it is still only one match on both Dynamite and Rampage, then it would be a valid complaint."

... yeah, saying you think it's ok for the women's division to suck isn't really an argument. 

You're also just factually wrong. Because, the division has plenty of talented and experienced women. Thunder Rosa, Serena Deeb, Ruby Soho, Leva Bates, Mercedes Martinez, Kris Statlander, Hikaru Shida, Britt Baker. These are not green wrestlers. Mercedes Martinez has 20 years or so of experience, Serena Deeb 10, Hikaru Shida 13 and is a former champion in AEW, Ruby Soho has over a decade of experience, Leva Bates 15. Do none of these women deserve some screen time in the on the company's main show? 

So, I still stand by my criticism. Can you actually explain why it's wrong? And, how about staying away from talking about whatever you're imagining is going on in my head, and stick to what I actually said?