By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
JWeinCom on 26 February 2022
Edit Thread
No_Name_Needed said:
JWeinCom said:

 Being a hater is arbitrarily finding fault where there is none due to bias. Not pointing out legitimate flaws.

So, again, was my criticism invalid? If not, then what's wrong with pointing out actual flaws?

So why did you yourself bring up the hater thing? You know you look like a AEW hater at this point so you pointed out before anyone else could perhaps?

Like I said you find flaws in everything they do, you don't like them, and there are plenty of others just like you. It is what it is, I myself can find a litany of things wrong with the WWE today. Hell if I listed them all you would probably say I am WWE hater and defend them. If one has a preference (or bias) one way or the other, that is how things usually play out with pro wrestling.

I have not found flaws in everything they've done. I've found flaws in particular things that are genuinely flawed.

Now, it's possible that I'm finding flaws because I'm just biased. Or, it's possible that I'm finding flaws because there are legitimate flaws. Since you can't actually point out anything I've said that is wrong, I would have to say it's the latter, and this is legitimate criticism not caused by bias.

Which brings me to your question. I brought it up, because I know there are some people who will interpret any criticism as being a hater, even when it is warranted and legitimate. ^_^

Edit: At any rate, I'm done dragging things off topic with the discussion of my personal biases or lackthereof. If you can point out a flaw in something I said about wrestling, go for it. Otherwise, I'm not going to bother responding.

Last edited by JWeinCom - on 26 February 2022