Soul Hackers 2 Announced for PS5, PS4, Xbox Series, Xbox One, and PC

[Rafie]

Leynos said:

Rafie said:

I could see that the Wii U was in the same range as the PS3/360, but stronger...nah. If it was, then it was marginally stronger. Not enough to write home about. I thought the PS3's GPU was excellent at the time. It was the CPU that wasn't that great. The 360 had the best CPU. Just an awesome console overall. I still love my Wii U, but I haven't seen the best game on it looked better than the best PS3 game.

PS3's CELL was a monster but few devs would take advantage of it. PS3 rushed a GPU in last minute as Sony planned to have PS3 use two CELL instead of a GPU but had to rush last minute to get a GPU and PS3's was a weaker GPU than 360's. PS3 was similar to the SEGA Saturn in it had an advanced processor but was too difficult to work with. Wii U was 7 years newer than those systems so of course it had more power.

I remember lots of devs complaining about how great the cell was, but hard to work with. That's why when the 1st party devs came in and did the games, they looked incredible. Again, there's not a Wii U game that I've seen that looks better than the best PS3 game. I meaning in comparison 1st party titles from both respective giants. The PS4 and the Xbox One are 3 years older than the Switch and they're still stronger than the Switch. We know Nintendo doesn't really care about power anymore.