By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
faustian.empire on 20 February 2022
Edit Thread
the-pi-guy said:
faustian.empire said:

My examples should have made it clear I was including Zenimax, when I was talking about the studio acquisitions being low key. Most people don't care about Roundhouse Studios, Alpha Dog Games MachineGames.  

Like I said the most notable studios they acquired were Bethesda Game Studios, ID and Zenimax Online. 

Frankly the Zenimax acquisition, arguably put MS's studios on par with Sony's. They didn't need to do anything to compete. 

I agreed with you,why are you debating this

Doesn't matter if a studio is low key. What matters is what kind of content they make, and whether the games can sell.  

Oh so MS buys low key and it doesn't matter but SONY buys low key an they will do wonders with it............lol

These are just platitudes, not facts. 

do you have any experience in life or not? - can't you understand analogy about the way life works.

nobody has unlimited talent

>Oh so MS buys low key and it doesn't matter but SONY buys low key an they will do wonders with it.

I'm not sure where you're getting this impression that it matters less. 

 

>do you have any experience in life or not? - can't you understand analogy about the way life works nobody has unlimited talent

Talent is not some kind of limited resource. It doesn't get used up when a game is launched.  

A songwriter that doesn't do as well with their second album did not lose talent. 

Talent is not some kind of limited resource. It doesn't get used up when a game is launched.

A songwriter that doesn't do as well with their second album did not lose talent.

the talent isn't gone but used so the returns are lower and lower.

and TALENT is a limited resource,don't you understand anything about the world? - if everybody ha talent then everybody would be successful but they are not