coolbeans said:
Your broad claim is totally mischaracterizing what he's said on the topic. Quote: Thus far, MS has maintained what Phil stated here: -Timed exclusivity contracts with Zenimax are being honored (Deathloop & Ghostwire) -Legacy titles, such as Fallout 76 & ESO, still have their place on PlayStation It's future titles with no previous contractual obligations where MS has free range to determine what is & isn't console-exclusive. You haven't disproven his "good guy attitude" with this example. |
Signed deals they wouldn`t really be able to cancel. Games that are already released there would be no point in removing. But new content won`t release, and that doesn`t really match with "play anywhere on the device you want" that he preaches. Same will happen here, CoD will keep coming to PS until the marketing deal is over, games released will keep for the time, new games won`t come.
That is what everyone expect, but Phil will use silver tongue to pretend he isn`t impacting PS players. But sure you can still think he is a good guy. Next are we going to say he doesn't talk more than every other company PR people combined?

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







